-->
American Resources Policy Network
Promoting the development of American mineral resources.
  • Why Tantalum should be on U.S. stakeholders’ radar

    Gearing up for their upcoming conference on conflict minerals in early May, our friends at MetalMiner are stepping up their coverage of Tantalum, one of the four minerals commonly referred to as conflict minerals, with the other ones being Tungsten, Tin and Gold. A recent MetalMiner guest post by Chelsea Craven of Zepol Corporation looks at Tantalum Imports and Exports in the U.S..

    Some of Craven’s key points:

      • Demand for Tantalum is exploding in the U.S. as it’s a key component in many electronic gadgets, including computers, smart phones and tablets
      • U.S. Tantalum trade had a “seesaw-like swing” in 2012, with imports having increased by 55 percent and exports having dipped by 16 percent.
      • The numbers for unwrought Tantalum (which refers to the metal in its unfinished form and includes bars and rods obtained simply by sintering) are even more staggering with an 88 percent increase in imports and a 30 percent drop in exports.
      • Number one supplier for U.S. Tantalum imports is China, and Chinese imports increased by 93 percent in 2012 alone.
      • With demand continuing to surge as gadgets and electronics evolve, the average import price of Tantalum has gone from $110 in 2011 to nearly $300 in 2012, while showing no signs of abating.

    Craven’s facts and figures underscore why Tantalum should be on everyone’s radar – and not only from the pure “conflict minerals” point of view, which relates to materials sourced from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and surrounding countries.

    Surging demand in light of Tantalum’s diverse unique properties, no significant U.S. mine production since the 1950s, challenges associated with the implementation of conflict minerals disclosure requirements, and China’s increasing role should be enough reason for U.S. stakeholders to keep Tantalum on their watch list.

    Share
  • China and Brazil increase resource footprint in Africa

    Last month, the Huffington Post published a column discussing the growing footprint of two emerging powers in Africa – China and Brazil. China is a known quantity on the continent, and has been the “unequivocal leader in infrastructure development within Africa.” More recently, however, Brazil has accelerated its efforts and more than quadrupled investment to more than $20 billion over the past decade.

    China’s motive for its aggressive investment strategy is clear: it’s about access to the continent’s mineral riches. But while Brazilian resource companies (both fuel and non-fuel) are leading the loan, aid and infrastructure campaign, Julia Neyman, citing Financial Times’ Deputy Emerging Markets Editor Jonathan Wheatley, argues that Brazil’s “move is ‘less about commodities, more about new markets.’”

    Whatever the ultimate motivation, Neyman is on point when she says:

    “Not only does Africa provide a necessary platform to showcase China and Brazil’s advancements to other BRIC and G20 nations, but the continent itself serves as a strategic future investment. […] If and when African nations become more important players on the world stage, China and Brazil’s political positions will have been favorably cemented.”

    The interesting question is, where is the United States in this picture?

    Share
  • Antimony metal to be watched

    In a piece for DailyMarkets.com, analyst Jeb Handwerger zeroes in on Antimony. Antimony is a key component in fire retardants as well as batteries, ceramics, touch-screen technology, glass, and ammunition and has seen largely stable prices in unstable economic times. With China being its top producer controlling nearly 90 percent of global supply and other [...]
  • Calls for Greenland’s independence grow louder amidst differences with Denmark over resource extraction

    Bloomberg reports that “Chinese interest in Greenland’s mineral wealth is reigniting the Arctic island’s campaign to sever ties with Denmark after almost 200 years of colonial rule.” According to a February 24 story, calls for the territory’s independence are growing louder as Denmark, which controls Greenland’s foreign policy, opposes Greenland’s plan to cooperate with Chinese [...]
  • New studies show focus on mineral resource security is finally increasing

    We’ve seen a flurry of new studies focused on mineral resource security over the past few months, an encouraging signal that the issue is increasingly getting the attention it deserves. While we would be remiss not to include our Critical Metals Report and our Gateway Metals Report, two of the more recent studies were released [...]
  • Global resource insecurity an issue that “should be on everyone’s radar screen”

    In yet another comprehensive piece for Resource Investor Aheadoftheherd.com host and Northern Venture Group President Rick Mills discusses the issue of global resource insecurity. Pointing out a long list of “serious concerns in regards to global resource extraction that we need to consider,” Mills’ piece zeroes in on costs, resource nationalism, civil unrest directed towards [...]
  • Antarctic mineral riches in the cross-hairs of resource wars

    The global race for resources has countries look for new ways to meet their mineral resource needs. We’re now used to seeing headlines about mineral riches in the Arctic, beneath the ocean seabed, and even asteroid mining. The latest region in the cross-hairs is Antarctica, with – you guessed it – China aggressively pursuing its [...]
  • The OPEC of Rare Earths – China’s Resource Stranglehold and its National Security Implications

    In his latest column for Real Clear World, American Resources Principal Daniel McGroarty zeros in on China’s dominance of the Rare Earths market. Invoking lopsided production numbers – in spite of international efforts to develop Rare Earths outside of China, China’s supply monopoly still hovers at 95 percent – McGroarty likens China’s REE control to [...]
  • New Year’s Resolutions for U.S. Policymakers (Part 2)

    Below is part two of American Resources’ three-part 2012 retrospective. Check out part one here. Traditionally, the New Year is the time when people reflect on the past twelve months and formulate resolutions for the months ahead. As the first hours of 2013 have been dominated by the drama the Fiscal Cliff, our Federal lawmakers [...]
  • More market manipulations from China?

    According to media reports surfacing this week, China is looking to cut essentially cut mining rights for REE producers in half – to 67 points down from 113. Analysts tie the move into China’s overall effort to “strengthen its pricing power in the international rare earth market.” This wouldn’t be the first time China, which [...]