In doing so, he rightfully stressed the importance of manufacturing as a key foundation for future prosperity, and acknowledged the challenges associated with relying on foreign energy sources.
Given American Resources’ focus, we’d be remiss if we didn’t inject an additional important component into the debate; a component to which Cong. Paul Gosar (AZ-1, R) alluded while live-tweeting during the President’s debate – the need for a national natural resource strategy:
The foundation of American manufacturing is the raw materials that feed the effort – not just fuel, but also non-fuel mineral resources that are critical to so many of the manufacturing applications we want to see developed here in the United States.
Page six of the newly published USGS Mineral Commodities Summary illustrates how far we are from this goal. The chart depicting U.S. dependence on foreign sources for key non-fuel mineral resources shows us 100% dependent on foreign supplies for nineteen metals and minerals, with China being one of our top three suppliers for eleven of the nineteen. For a whopping forty-three metals and minerals, our import dependency rate stands at 50% or more.
The fact is, we are not fortunate in all cases to have potential resources under our soil, but for dozens of these metals we do have the opportunity to reduce our foreign dependence – and create well-paying jobs in the process.
The key to our economic and strategic future is connecting the dots between manufacturing, energy and resources, and formulating a coherent critical mineral strategy that keeps us competitive as the global race for resources heats up. Will U.S. policy recognize that American manufacturing begins with American metals and minerals?