-->
American Resources Policy Network
Promoting the development of American mineral resources.
  • Pentagon Waiver for REE Magnets Used in F-35 Combat Jet Engines Underscores Critical Mineral Dependency Conundrum

    With the coronavirus pandemic and growing geopolitical tensions having shone a light on U.S. over-reliance on foreign sources across our nation’s critical mineral value chains and its implications for our national and economic security, domestic stakeholders have stepped up their efforts to decouple U.S. supply chains from reliance on our adversaries.

    While for “battery criticals” the most recent notable step was the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) with its sourcing requirements for lithium, cobalt, graphite, nickel and manganese, measures addressing rare earth element supply chains included the invocation of Title III of the Defense Production Act for Rare Earth Elements and a DoD allocation of $35 million for a heavy rare earth separation and processing project in California.

    While these are important steps, real-life examples show just how deep our nation’s over-reliance really is:

    Earlier this fall, the Pentagon, as part of its “efforts to decouple U.S. defense companies’ sprawling global supply chains from China,” as the Wall Street Journal phrases it, said it had begun using artificial intelligence to analyze whether U.S. military contractors source aircraft parts, electronics and raw materials used in U.S. military equipment from China and/or other potential adversaries.

    Learning that engine parts for new F-35 combat jets made by Lockheed Martin Corp. contained magnets sourced from Honeywell International, Inc. with a cobalt samarium metal alloy produced in China — which constituted a violation of U.S. procurement laws — the Defense Department last month halted accepting new jets from the company.

    The company has since  been granted a waiver, and with it, the Pentagon will accept all aircraft under the contract.

    The waiver was granted because the “magnet does not transmit information or harm aircraft, and […] there are no security risks involved,” but Honeywell will have to work to find an alternative source for the metal alloy used in the F-35 engine parts.

    Meanwhile, analysts say that with the waiver allowing an alloy of Chinese origins to continue to be used in the manufacture of F-35 combat jets, “the US military has exposed its dependence on Chinese rare-earth products, and China can opt to limit the export of such strategic resources to safeguard its national security.”

    China, not surprisingly, is an interested observer in the U.S. supply chain travails.  As the Global Times reports, citing a manager of a Chinese state-owned rare earth enterprise in Ganzhou, East China’s Jiangxi province, with China having a leading edge in the middle-to downstream rare earth magnet production, the “U.S. attempt to remove China-origin alloy imports from military equipment is almost ‘a mission impossible.’ from both a short-term and long-term perspective.” According to unnamed manager, “China is the only country in the world that has developed the ability to extract samarium and cobalt rare-earth metals, which means the middle product samarium oxide is almost 100 percent made in Chinese factories. We also account for over 70 percent of the final product samarium-cobalt rare-earth magnet. How can Washington take out Chinese rare-earth products from its jets in such a scenario?“

    A similar dependency applies to China-made neodymium magnets.

    A Beijing-based military expert, Wei Dongxu, contacted by the Global Times argued that with the U.S. using the materials for military purposes, which could “harm China’s sovereignty, territorial integrity and development interests,” “China should consider applying more strict export controls on rare earth products.”

    The waiver referenced above is only the latest in a series of waivers granted by Pentagon officials under similar circumstances — all of which goes to show how difficult it is to untangle critical mineral supply chains.

    However, with geopolitical and trade tensions rising — both between the United States and China and generally on the global stage — and with China’s known penchant for using its advantage as leverage, there is no alternative to turbo-charging the effort to secure U.S. domestic supply chains for critical minerals across the board.

  • State-Level Public-Private Cooperation to Bolster Critical Mineral Supply Chains: A Look at Michigan

    At ARPN, we have long been spotlighting federal policy initiatives to bolster our critical mineral supply chains. Meanwhile, often considered policy laboratories, the individual states are also not sitting idly by, and it’s time to feature some of their efforts.

    With the EV revolution fueling much of the skyrocketing demand for the “battery criticals” lithium, cobalt, graphite, nickel and manganese, it is only fitting that our first example takes us Michigan, home to Detroit, the cradle of the U.S. automobile industry.

    As Tim Higgins reports for the Wall Street Journal, the State of Michigan earlier this month approved a more than $200 million grant for Our Next Energy Inc.’s (ONE) planned EV battery factory in Van Buren Township, Michigan.  The company, an EV battery startup spearheaded by a former leader of Apple Inc.’s secretive car project, plans to invest $1.6 billion into the project, which is slated to be fully operational by the end of 2027 and have the capacity make battery cells for about 200,000 EVs annually.

    The push to build out a comprehensive domestic EV battery supply chain, as followers of ARPN well know, received a jolt of energy with the passage of the federal Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and its domestic sourcing requirements for EV credits.

    While the U.S. automotive industry has largely focused on lithium-ion battery cells, ONE, according to Higgins, aims to ultimately produce 20 gigawatt hours, amounting to the equivalent of battery packs for about 200,000 vehicles each year by focusing on lithium iron phosphate (or lithium ferro-phosphate, LFP) cells, which, while said to have a shorter range than its lithium-ion peer, is also considered to be less volatile and less expensive.

    ONE’s goal is to also build a battery pack with a more than 600-mile range at a significantly lower price point for the cells making up the pack.

    The State of Michigan’s $236.6 million in state funding for the project include

    • A $200 million Critical Industry Program performance-based grant through the Strategic Outreach and Attraction Reserve (“SOAR”) Fund
    • A $15 million Jobs for Michigan Investment Fund Loan
    • State Essential Services Assessment Exemption valued at $21.6 million

    In a statement released on October 5, 2022, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said of the project:

    “Our Next Energy’s $1.6 billion investment creating 2,112 jobs in Van Buren Township will build on our economic momentum and secure the future of mobility and electrification right here in Michigan. This innovative, Michigan-made company is on the cutting-edge of battery technology, and the work they’re doing will increase the range of electric vehicles to over 600 miles on a single charge. 

    With this new gigafactory, we will continue bringing the supply chain of electric vehicles, chips, and batteries home to Michigan and the USA while creating a sustainable, clean energy economy. I am proud that Democrats and Republicans in Michigan came together to build up our economic development toolkit and empowered our state to compete for every project and every job.”

    States like Texas, Georgia,Kansas and Oklahoma have also attracted battery makers as automakers scramble to lock down supplies and policy stakeholders work to create frameworks conducive to attracting investment into these critical industries.

    In the coming weeks and months, ARPN will continue to feature more examples of state level public-private cooperation or formalized public private partnerships (PPPs) to sustainably strengthen domestic critical mineral supply chains.

  • U.S. Senator Demands Information From Department of Energy over Potential Chinese Ties Relating to Nevada Mining Project

    As geopolitical tensions between China and the West are on the rise, and critical mineral supply chain pressures continue to mount against the backdrop of the accelerating green energy transition, U.S. Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm demanding information from her department regarding recent reports that the Department of (…) more

  • As Global Environmental and Geopolitical Pressures Intensify, So Do Cooperative Efforts — A Look at the Canadian-South Korean Critical Minerals Partnership and the MSP

    While the coronavirus pandemic may no longer occupy the top of the hour slot in news broadcasts, the supply chain challenges it unearthed for many of the materials we rely upon are here to stay.  And as the global push towards net zero carbon emissions gets kicked into high gear, nations are increasingly realizing their own (…) more

  • National Clean Energy Week Underscores Importance of Critical Mineral Supply Chains

    Underscoring the importance of the green energy transition to modern society, the U.S. Senate earlier this week passed a resolution, the U.S. House of Representatives  introduced a corresponding resolution, and several governors issued their own declarations designating September 26th through 30th “National Clean Energy Week.” National Clean Energy Week is billed as an annual week-long “celebration of clean energy innovation” to “help solve (…) more

  • Battery Show Panels Mull Options to Strengthen U.S. Battery Supply Chains in Wake of Inflation Reduction Act Passage

    As one of the longest running and biggest automobile shows in North America, the North American International Auto Show (NAIAS) — or the Detroit auto show, as it is known more colloquially — has traditionally been one of the key events for car makers every year.   This year, however, another concurrently held event taking place roughly 30 miles (…) more

  • Not Just the “Battery Criticals” — Green Energy Transition’s Mineral Intensity Requires Broader Focus: A Look at the “Solar Metals”

    Recent media coverage might have you believe critical mineral policy only revolves around the “battery criticals”lithium, graphite, nickel, cobalt and manganese, and maybe the frequently referenced, though still somewhat obscure rare earths.  However, as followers of ARPN well know, this is far from the truth. The New South Wales Department of Planning and environment has taken a (…) more

  • A Look at the Inflation Reduction Act and Its Potential to “Reclaim Critical Mineral Chains”

    In a comprehensive new piece for Foreign Policy, director of the Payne Institute and professor of public policy at the Colorado School of Mines Morgan Bazilian, and postdoctoral fellow at the Jackson Institute for Global Affairs at Yale University Gregory Brew take a closer look at the recently passed Inflation Reduction Act’s energy provisions, which in their (…) more

  • European Union to Step Up its Critical Minerals Game against the Backdrop of Surging Demand Forecasts

    The Russian invasion of Ukraine and subsequent additional supply chain challenges have prompted the European Union — already grappling with strained supply chains in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic — to step up its critical minerals game. During her State of the Union address on September 14, European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen announced (…) more

  • New Publication Alert – Metal Tech News Releases Comprehensive 2022 North American Primer on Critical Minerals

    Shane Lasley is known to followers of ARPN for his stellar reporting on critical mineral resource issues from an Alaskan perspective.  Today, his Metal Tech News project has published the second iteration of what may just be the most comprehensive North American primer on critical minerals: Critical Minerals Alliances 2022 is a magazine covering 29 metals and minerals (when counting rare (…) more

Archives