Search Results

In his testimony before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources earlier this week, ARPN Principal Dan McGroarty warned of the challenges of our growing dependence on foreign mineral resources. 

McGroarty contrasted his mineral resource outlook with that of the energy side, where we are witnessing the a remarkable resurgence and “emergence of a vibrant oil and gas sector after generations of energy dependence” that is transforming the U.S. into an energy exporter. He alerted Senators and attendees to the latest USGS figures, which show that we are 100% import dependent for 20 metals and minerals – up from 19 in 2015, and has us more than 50% import-dependent for 50, amounting to “roughly half the naturally-occurring elements on the Periodic Table.”

McGroarty said that:

“[A]t a time when we are engaged in a serious national debate on how best to revive American manufacturing, we are increasingly dependent on foreign sources for the metals and minerals we need for major weapons platforms, alternative energy applications, and all manner of high-tech devices from smart phones to smart bombs.

And this, in spite of the fact that the U.S. is resource-rich, blessed with known resources of dozens of the critical metals and minerals that are shaping our 21st Century.”

To reinforce his point, McGroarty cited Graphite and Manganese, key elements of Lithium Ion battery technology, Rare Earths, and Indium as examples of metals and minerals with broad military and civilian applications for which we are 100% import dependent. He further referenced Gallium, Rhenium, Tellurium, and Cobalt – similarly critical materials with military and civilian uses, as metals and minerals for which we are more than 70% import dependent.  

While McGroarty also listed some positive developments, including process improvements and new extracting technologies “arising out of necessity – the need to efficiently extract minerals from low-grade deposits,” Senator Sen. Angus King (I-ME) called his testimony “very sobering,” and his colleagues declared that the issue warranted follow-up. 

Here’s hoping that these assertions are more than paying lip service. As followers of ARPN know, there are ways to address the challenge and mitigate the problems associated with our over-reliance on foreign mineral resources. Among them are streamlining of our nation’s onerous and outdated permitting process, as well as tackling the “co-product challenge: The fact that dozens of the critical metals and minerals needed for tech applications are not mined in their own right – but are recovered as ‘by-products,’ or given their rising importance, ‘co-products,’ of major industrial minerals not often thought of as critical.”

However, actions speak louder than words. The global resource wars are heating up – and we cannot afford to sit idly by.

As McGroarty concluded: 

“If we are serious about ensuring U.S. military power and reviving American manufacturing, we must reverse the deep dependency on foreign metals and minerals, and treat American resource security with the same seriousness – and one would hope, the same success – as our approach to American energy security.”

To read full testimony and watch this week’s hearing visit the committee’s website. Mr. McGroarty’s testimony starts 52:10 minutes into the hearing. 

 

As ARPN followers know, our growing reliance on foreign mineral resources has serious implications for our national security, competitiveness and the resurgence of American manufacturing. Against this background, the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources will be holding a timely hearing to “Examine the Status & Outlook for U.S. and North American Energy and Resource Security” this Tuesday at 10:30 a.m.

ARPN Principal Dan McGroarty has been asked to testify and will discuss the challenges associated with our growing dependence on foreign mineral (non-fuel) mineral resources, as well as ways to mitigate the problems. 

He will be joined by witnesses from the International Energy Agency, the American Security Project, the American Nuclear Society, the Manhattan Institute and the Center for Energy Impact at Boston Consulting Group.

The hearing will be webcast live on the committee’s website. If you can’t follow the live proceedings, archived video will be made available shortly after the hearing along with full written witness testimony. We will also post a more detailed write-up along with commentary later this week, so be sure to check back after the hearing. 

It is “the single largest source of mineral commodities for the United States, particularly for resources like rare earth elements, germanium, and industrial diamonds,” according to the United States Geological Survey, which notes in its most recent Mineral Commodity Summaries report that “of the 47 mineral commodities that the United States is more than 50 [...]

Happy Birthday, America! Another trip around the sun, and we’re back on the eve of the 4th of July gearing up for parades, barbecues and fireworks in honor of the men and women who have fought, and continue to safeguard our freedom today. Last year, we used this opportunity to point out that while we cherish [...]

At ARPN, we have consistently highlighted the importance of Gateway Metals, which are materials that are not only critical to manufacturing and national security in their own right, but also “unlock” tech metals increasingly important to innovation and technological development. With advancements in materials science, these co-products, many of which have unique properties lending themselves [...]

While relations between Russia and the United States continue to make headlines on a daily basis, one particular aspect of this relationship – in spite of the fact that it may be one of the most contentious ones – has been largely flying under the radar. As Fox News national security correspondent Jennifer Griffin recently wrote: [...]

At ARPN, we have long highlighted the important but oft-overlooked nexus between resource policy and geopolitics.   The latest case in point is South Korea, which, as ARPN President Daniel McGroarty points out in his latest opinion piece for Fox News, is navigating murky waters “talking sunshine and Rare Earths as North Korean war clouds gather.” For decades, [...]

At ARPN, we have long argued that our over-reliance on foreign minerals is problematic – particularly in light of the fact that the United States itself is home to vast mineral resources. Recognizing the importance of the issue, the United States Geological Survey (USGS), which has long been a formidable source of relevant data and [...]

The following is a guest post by American Resources expert and J.A. Green & Company president and founder Jeffery A. Green The United States has placed itself in a very precarious situation with respect to its ability to produce and refine strategic and critical materials. Over the past few years we have willfully ceded our last remaining [...]

For over two decades, the United States Geological Survey has released its Mineral Commodity Summaries report.  And while ARPN followers will know how important this publication is, as it provides a snapshot of our nation’s mineral resource dependencies, in most years its release has gone largely unnoticed beyond the circles of mineral resource wonks. This year, a [...]