-->
American Resources Policy Network
Promoting the development of American mineral resources.
  • With Rare Display of Bipartisanship in Congress and Resource Partnership Announcement With Allied Nations, Momentum Building for Mineral Resource Policy Reform

    Late last week, we witnessed the formal announcement of a forthcoming roll out of an “action plan” to counter Chinese dominance in the critical minerals sector during Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s week-long state visit to the U.S..

    According to news reports the plan will “open a new front against China in a widening technology and trade war by exploiting Australian reserves of the rare earths and other materials that are essential for products ranging from iPhones to batteries and hybrid cars.”

    Partnerships with reliable allies like Australia will go far — but they must be complemented by increased domestic production of critical minerals in the United States.   As ARPN expert panel member and president and founder of government relations firm J.A. Green & Co. Jeff Green wrote in a recent piece for Real Clear Politics  — if policymakers want to get serious about securing U.S. access to rare earths, “any real solution must include investing in our domestic production capabilities.” 

    Thankfully, as the tech wars deepen, calls for increasing U.S. domestic production of critical minerals ranging from those underpinning the battery tech revolution to the Rare Earths that have filled headlines in recent months, are getting louder. 

    Chairing a full Senate Committee hearing to “examine the sourcing and use of minerals needed for clean energy technologies,” earlier last week U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said in her opening remarks: 

    “Minerals are the fundamental building blocks for any modern technology, but they don’t just appear out of thin air. As our energy sector transitions to greater use of renewables, we must acknowledge that these technologies are built from materials that come from the ground. Batteries don’t work without lithium, graphite, cobalt and nickel; solar panels require silver gallium, indium, tellurium; and wind turbines are not just built from steel, but also aluminum, copper, and rare earth elements.”

    Witnesses testifying at the hearing, during the course of which Sen. Murkowski released a Congressional Research Service Report comparing global forecasts for minerals used in renewable technologies, told Senators that the renewable energy transition must involve greater investment in the domestic mining of critical minerals, including the rare earths.

    The question and answer session following the prepared expert remarks saw an unusual display of bipartisanship amongst Senators all of whom agreed that a more “holistic approach” to critical mineral resource policy was warranted and that when it comes to critical minerals extracting, processing, recycling… now is our call to action. 

    Ultimately, whether or not the U.S. can unleash its own mineral potential and compete with China in the tech wars of the 21st Century will depend on policy makers’ ability to come together. As Sen. Murkowski stated:

    “The United States is capable of being a leader in the development of the minerals needed for clean energy technologies. We have incredible high-grade deposits in states like Alaska, but we have also ceded production, manufacturing, and recycling to our competitors. (…) We have to find the political will to advance policies that allow us to rebuild a robust domestic supply chain. Until we do that, our nation’s ability to develop and lead the world in renewable energy will be limited.”

    The momentum is here. Let’s hope stakeholders seize it. 

    Share
  • U.S. and Australia to Roll Out “Mutually Beneficial” Action Plan to Improve Security and Supply of Rare Earths

    Building on recent agency-level talks the United States and Australia have used the occasion of Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s week long state visit to the United States to formally announce the forthcoming roll out of an “action plan” to counter Chinese dominance in the critical minerals sector, and specifically the Rare Earths sector.

    According to news reports the plan will “open a new front against China in a widening technology and trade war by exploiting Australian reserves of the rare earths and other materials that are essential for products ranging from iPhones to batteries and hybrid cars.”

    Ahead of the formal state dinner at the White House (which Morrison is only the second world leader to be treated to by President Trump after France’s Emmanuel Macron), a senior U.S. administration official had briefed media on the action plan stating that:

    “[w]e’re going to be rolling out a plan to improve security and supply of rare earth in a way that is mutually beneficial to both countries and strengthens our — both security — our physical security and our economic security.”

    Last month, the U.S. Department of Defense had announced it was in talks with Australia “to host a facility that would process rare earth minerals, part of an effort to reduce reliance on China for the specialized materials used in military equipment,” an announcement that followed on the heels of a partnership agreement between the U.S., Australia and Japan which includes the setting up of a separation facility in the U.S..

    The growing realization that the materials science revolution requires a more comprehensive, strategic and concerted approach to resource policy than that pursued by the United States to date is a welcome development.  

    However, as ARPN’s Dan McGroarty recently outlined, decades of failure to prioritize mineral resource policy issues have left a mark, and big questions remain:

    “How will China respond to the new U.S. action?  And how quickly can the U.S. close the rare earths gap — with production today at zero, even as known U.S. rare earth resources exist — before China loses its leverage over materials the U.S. Government has deemed critical to ‘the national economy and national security?’” 

    As the tech war deepens, our odds are increasing in light of increased cooperation with allied nations like Australia.

    Share
  • Full Senate Committee Hearing on Minerals and Clean Energy Technologies Outlines the High Stakes of Resource Policy

    Bearing testimony to the increasing awareness regarding our nation’s critical mineral resource issues, the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources chaired by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) earlier today held a full committee hearing on “Minerals and Clean Energy Technologies.” Witnesses included The Honorable Daniel Simmons, Assistant Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency [...]
  • U.S. Senator: “Our Energy Future Is Bright, But Only If We Recognize The World We Are In”

    As the tech wars over Rare Earths and other critical metals and minerals deepen, competition is heating up in another field of resource policy.  In a new piece for the Washington Times, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) discusses the new realities of a globalized energy market and the consequences associated with America’s declining nuclear energy [...]
  • ARPN Expert Panel Member on Strategic Metals Supply Chain in an Era of De-Globalization

    The trade war between China and the U.S., tensions between Russia and the West, the green energy transition — today’s political, geopolitical and economic pressures have significant implications for resource development. In a new piece on his blog, ARPN expert panel member and president of President of House Mountain Partners, LLC Chris Berry discusses “[t]he Strategic [...]
  • Greenland at the Heart of Resource Race in 21st Century Tech War

    While a deal is not likely to happen, and some question whether the comment was more quip than opening offer, President Trump’s recent interest in buying Greenland from Denmark has done one thing: bring Greenland and the Arctic into focus.   The President’s suggestion has been ridiculed by many, but from a strategic perspective — [...]
  • U.S. Steps Up International Cooperation to Counter Chinese Resource Threat

    Against the backdrop of mounting Chinese-American trade tensions, the United States is stepping up cooperative efforts with allies to reduce its reliance on Chinese supplies of Rare Earths.   The most recent case in point – a partnership with Australia and Japan – includes the setting up of a separation facility in the U.S. Reports [...]
  • China’s Leverage: Supply Monopoly Shapes U.S. Policy

    In case you were wondering to what extent foreign powers are shaping domestic policy, the UK’s daily The Telegraph has a great overview piece on how “China’s supply of rare minerals, used in products like the iPhone, is causing a headache for Washington.” Using one of the most popular telecommunications gadgets – the iPhone – [...]
  • McGroarty: Tech Wars Heat Up – Administration Invokes Defense Production Act to Spur Domestic REE Development

    ARPN’s Dan McGroarty discusses President Trump’s decision to invoke the Defense Production Act to spur domestic REE development for The Economic Standard: The Tech Wars Heat Up: U.S. Makes National Security Declarations to Spur Rare Earths Development Forget the trade war – the tech war is heating up.  After weeks of Chinese threats that it [...]
  • China’s Grand Strategy to Exploit United States’ “Soft Underbelly” Goes Beyond Rare Earths

    Much is being made of China’s recent threats to cut off Rare Earth exports to the United States, and the issue has – finally – helped bring the issue of mineral resource policy reform to the forefront.  However, as Ian Easton, research fellow at the Project 2049 Institute and author of The Chinese Invasion Threat, [...]

Archives